A notable regulatory conflict has erupted in the US over commercial driver's licenses. California attempted to reinstate thousands of non-domiciled CDLs that were previously subject to cancellation, but the US Department of Transportation (DOT) and the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) halted this move.
The situation directly affects drivers, carriers, and the freight market as a whole—especially in the country's largest state.
As reported by the industry publication Overdrive, California authorities notified federal agencies of their intention to reinstate approximately 17,000 non-domiciled CDLs, believing that the state had resolved previously identified violations. However, the DOT did not consent to these actions and effectively blocked the reinstatement of the licenses. Federal regulators deemed that oversight requirements were not fully met (Overdrive Online).
Non-domiciled CDLs are commercial driver's licenses issued to drivers who do not have a permanent residence in the issuing state. Federal regulations require strict compliance with parameters such as legal residency status and the validity of permit documents.
Following an audit, the FMCSA reported systemic issues in the procedures for issuing such licenses in California. According to federal authorities, some CDLs were issued with violations, jeopardizing unified safety and control standards.
The FMCSA issued regulatory clarifications aimed at "restoring the integrity of the issuance process for non-domiciled CDLs." The agency's official materials emphasize that states must fully comply with federal requirements before resuming the issuance or reinstatement of such licenses (FMCSA).
The California DMV states that it continues to work with the FMCSA and is taking steps to mitigate negative impacts on drivers and the transportation industry. In one of its official statements, the agency indicated that it is notifying affected drivers and adjusting the timelines for implementing measures while continuing to interact with federal agencies (California DMV).
For the freight market, the situation creates significant uncertainty. Drivers with non-domiciled CDLs risk temporarily losing their right to work, carriers may face staffing challenges, and the conflict raises broader questions about the boundaries of state and federal regulatory powers in the transportation sector.
Federal agencies insist on full compliance with corrective requirements before California can reinstate the disputed licenses. Until then, drivers and companies are advised to closely monitor official FMCSA clarifications and DMV notifications, as further decisions could significantly impact the labor market in the freight sector.
The story of non-domiciled CDLs vividly illustrates how sensitive the issue of regulating commercial driver's licenses remains—at the intersection of safety, law, and economics.

