In 2025, the USA began stricter enforcement of the English language proficiency requirement for truck drivers. Although the rule has existed for many years, it has now become a real risk factor for drivers and carriers — up to immediate removal from service during a roadside inspection.
Federal regulations require CDL drivers to be able to read and speak English at a level sufficient for safe operation. This includes communicating with inspectors, understanding road signs and signals, and being able to answer official questions without an interpreter. This requirement is enshrined in regulation 49 CFR § 391.11(b)(2) and is explained in detail in FMCSA materials and industry expert analyses.
It is important to emphasize: this is not about a new law. It is about the return of strict enforcement, which had been partially relaxed in previous years.
Under the updated instructions, the inspector must begin communication with the driver exclusively in English. If the driver cannot maintain a basic conversation, a formal language proficiency assessment is initiated.
Typically, it looks like this:
- oral interview: questions about the route, cargo, documents;
- checking understanding of road signs and electronic displays;
- assessing the ability to adequately respond to the inspector's instructions.
As noted in the official explanations for inspectors:
"If a driver is unable to understand and respond to questions in English, it is considered a violation of driver qualification requirements" trucksafe.com.
If the result is unsatisfactory, the driver may be immediately declared out of service, meaning the truck is not allowed to continue until the issue is resolved.
Federal authorities explain their position with safety concerns. In their logic, a driver who does not understand road directions, temporary signs, or police instructions poses an increased risk to other road users.
Industry reviews emphasize that the new procedure aims for a uniform standard across the country, rather than subjective decisions by individual inspectors.
The market reaction has been mixed. On one hand, large carriers and insurance companies support the initiative, seeing it as a step towards reducing accidents. On the other — many drivers, especially immigrants, fear losing their jobs due to the language barrier, even if their practical driving experience is impeccable.
Driver communities point out that the assessment of "sufficient" English proficiency can be subjective, and the consequences are extremely serious: cargo delays, fines, and loss of income.
For drivers:
- knowledge of conversational English becomes not an advantage, but a mandatory condition for work;
- it is useful to practice answering typical inspector questions in advance and to review road signs.
For companies:
- language testing is increasingly included in the hiring process;
- there is a growing need to document drivers' compliance with FMCSA requirements.
The tightening of English language proficiency enforcement is not a formality or a political statement, but a practical change that is already affecting the industry. For drivers, it is a signal: language becomes as much a safety element as brakes or a tachograph. Ignoring this requirement in 2026 means risking not only the trip but the entire career.