The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) abandoned an appeal in a case where federal transportation funding was linked to state immigration policies. However, this decision does not mean a reduction in immigration pressure on the trucking industry. Regulatory attention to CDL — and especially to non-domiciled CDL — continues to intensify through other mechanisms.
The Trump administration officially withdrew its attempt to challenge a federal court decision that prohibited the DOT from linking the allocation of transportation funds to states' cooperation with immigration authorities.
Previously, the DOT stated that states not supporting federal immigration priorities could face cuts in infrastructure project funding. In response, several states filed lawsuits, arguing that such conditions exceeded the department's authority.
The court agreed with this position, noting that transportation funding and immigration regulation are legally distinct areas. As a result, the administration decided not to pursue an appeal.
This is about abandoning one specific legal tool, not a change in overall policy.
The court affirmed a basic principle of federal law:
Federal agencies cannot impose funding conditions not provided by Congress.
Transportation grants are governed by transportation law, not immigration. The attempt to combine these areas was deemed an overreach.
This decision does indeed limit the use of infrastructure funding as leverage — but only in this format.
At first glance, this may seem like a positive signal for the market. In practice, it is more complex.
Despite abandoning the appeal:
- federal oversight of non-domiciled CDL continues
- states receive informal and formal signals to tighten CDL issuance requirements
- programs for issuing non-domiciled CDL are already frozen or restricted
This is directly reflected in FMCSA administrative actions and published regulatory documents. In particular, changes and restrictions in non-domiciled CDL issuance rules are recorded in the Interim Final Rule FMCSA, published in the Federal Register.
FMCSA also officially reported on the suspension and review of temporary rules for non-domiciled CDL:
For companies relying on immigrant drivers, this creates long-term uncertainty rather than reduced risks.
The trucking industry is already under pressure:
- high driver turnover
- limited influx of new CDL
- rising costs for hiring and retaining staff
Immigration instability amplifies all these factors, making planning even less predictable.
Abandoning the appeal does not mean reduced activity in the immigration and regulatory sphere. Pressure continues through other channels:
- bills directly affecting CDL requirements
- FMCSA administrative rules, inspections, and clarifications
- increased compliance and audits at the state level
- changes in non-domiciled CDL issuance rules, formally enshrined in FMCSA documents and the Federal Register
Simply put, the strategy has shifted from loud legal conflicts to more "quiet," but sustained regulation.
Short-term
- check the status of drivers' CDL and immigration documents
- monitor rule changes for each state separately
- consider the risk of sudden restrictions or program freezes
Long-term
- reduce dependence on vulnerable license categories
- invest in retaining drivers with stable status
- consider language and compliance risks when hiring
Regulatory volatility is becoming the norm. Immigration policy and the trucking industry are now closely linked, regardless of individual court decisions.
The Trump administration's abandonment of the appeal is a tactical move, not a strategic shift.
Immigration and regulatory pressure continues — just in a different form.
Companies that perceive this news as the end of the conflict risk facing problems later — at the licensing and compliance level.